← Search

James Sumrall

Hattiesburg, MS
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
93 matches · 64W–29L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add James Sumrall to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history93 matches
W
2026-08-16 · Sumrall 3.0-4.0 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Brian Long
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-08-02 · Sumrall 3.0-4.0 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Allen Boleware
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-02 · Sumrall 6.5 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Allen Boleware
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-19 · Sumrall 3.0-4.0 · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jon Goldman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-07-18 · Sumrall 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brooke Stuart mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
L
Jon Goldman / Nathan Dillon
2026-07-13 · Butler 2.5-3.5 · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jamie Massengale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-09 · Sumrall 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brooke Stuart mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-04-26 · Tatum-4.0-18's · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jon Goldman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-19 · Tatum-4.0-18's · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Long
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-04-12 · Sumrall 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Morgan Mccarty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-03-29 · Sumrall 3.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian Long
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-03-15 · Sumrall 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jon Goldman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams88 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 54.6% of games
3.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 50.8% of games
3.5
79.3%
23W–6L · 61.8% of games
4.0
60%
6W–4L · 53.8% of games
6.5
90.9%
10W–1L · 68.4% of games
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
66.7%
10W–5L · 58.6% of games
4.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 41% of games
6.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 65.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 55% of the time
#1 Doubles
55%
51 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
12 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova