← Search

Amy Pham

Manasquan, NJ
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
103 matches · 56W–47L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Amy Pham to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history103 matches
L
2026-08-02 · #4 Doubles · with Shannon Guarascio championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-06-04 · served hot · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-05-28 · served hot · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Fox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-05-21 · served hot · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-04-17 · Game Changers · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Suzanne Crosby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-16 · The Legendary Ninjas · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristi Linz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-10 · Game Changers · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Lasher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-2
L
2026-03-27 · Game Changers · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Luz Romero
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-03-26 · The Legendary Ninjas · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Prager
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-03-20 · Game Changers · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cynthia Galvin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-03-19 · Fully Loaded · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tina Wong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-12 · Fully Loaded · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
60%
12W–8L · 54.5% of games
3.5
55.4%
41W–33L · 50.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 53% of the time
#3 Doubles
53%
55 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
27 matches
#1 Doubles
10%
10 matches
#1 Singles
6%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams