← Search

Suzanne Crosby

Neptune, NJ
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
241 matches · 131W–110L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Suzanne Crosby to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history241 matches
W
2026-08-17 · Love65 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jill Bacso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-08-14 · #1 Doubles · with Meegan Fitzgerald championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-14 · #3 Doubles · with Michelle Prager championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-10 · Love65 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jill Bacso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-08-08 · #1 Doubles · with Gail Fierstein championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-08-07 · #1 Doubles · with Carolyn Stanyek championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-08-01 · #1 Doubles · with Lori Bennett championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-27 · Love65 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jill Bacso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · with Carolyn Stanyek championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-24 · #1 Doubles · with Michelle Prager championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-20 · Love65 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jill Bacso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-14 · Match Wiser · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Katherine Au
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 33.3% of games
3.5
56.1%
83W–65L · 52.9% of games
4.0
33.3%
3W–6L · 42% of games
7.0
59.1%
13W–9L · 52.5% of games
8.0
72%
18W–7L · 57.6% of games
7.0mixed
50%
6W–6L · 45.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 57% of the time
#1 Doubles
57%
138 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
56 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
42 matches
#1 Singles
2%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova