← Search

Kelsey Coady

— year-end
10 matches · 7W–3L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add Kelsey Coady to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history10 matches
L
2026-09-11 · Team 29 Royal Oaks/Carter W3.5F · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathy Adams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-18 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathy Adams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-06 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Haley Collard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
Katie Bowden / Kelly Edwards
2026-02-20 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Monica Knake
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-01-16 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ashley Jeter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-01-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kirstin Brookshire
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
Meredith Foster / Lauren Harris
2025-10-31 · Royal Oaks/Korinek W3.5F · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ashley Blurton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W
2025-06-26 · Royal Oaks/Korinek W3.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Courtney Mayberry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2025-02-26 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cameron Allison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2024-10-04 · Royal Oaks/Bard W3.0 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kerry Peterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
Teams15 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 48.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 50% of the time
#3 Doubles
50%
5 matches
#2 Doubles
40%
4 matches
#1 Doubles
10%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova