← Search

Monica Knake

— year-end
38 matches · 21W–17L · seasons 2025–2027

Captains: add Monica Knake to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history38 matches
L
Martha Farrell / Laura Walker
2026-09-11 · Team 29 Royal Oaks/Carter W3.5F · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tongula Steddum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-13 · Seay/Park-Margolis W3.5S · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca Heller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-06 · Seay/Park-Margolis W3.5S · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marla Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-06-03 · Royal Oaks/Copley-Carter W3.5T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Dalrymple
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-05-30 · Seay/Park-Margolis W3.5S · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Walker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-05-01 · Royal Oaks/Copley-Carter W3.5T · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
Katie Bowden / Kelly Edwards
2026-02-20 · Royal Oaks/Carter W3.5F · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelsey Coady
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-02-15 · Seay TC/Park-Margolis W3.5S · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lindsey Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-02-13 · Royal Oaks/Carter W3.5F · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cameron Allison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-02-08 · Seay TC/Park-Margolis W3.5S · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-01-16 · Royal Oaks/Carter W3.5F · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2025-10-19 · Seay/Park-Margolis W3.5S · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
Teams17 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
3.5
55.3%
21W–17L · 54.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
15 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
9 matches
#1 Singles
24%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
3 matches
#2 Singles
5%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova