← Search

Mary Jane Manners

— year-end
63 matches · 23W–40L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Mary Jane Manners to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history63 matches
W
2026-08-08 · #3 Doubles · with Tracy Guglielmo championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-06-16 · Sweet & Slicey · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gena Orlando
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-06-05 · Hits and Giggles · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jaime Shapiro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-29 · Hits and Giggles · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Suzanne Mazzucca
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-20 · Vintage Volleyers · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gena Orlando
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-05-15 · Hits and Giggles · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Walsh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-12 · Sweet & Slicey · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jaime Shapiro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-15 · Vintage Volleyers · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gerilyn Mahlof
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-04-01 · Vintage Volleyers · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Melanie Neubelt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-02-06 · NJD/Love to Play · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathleen Wallace
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-01-30 · Hits and Giggles · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jaime Shapiro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-01-23 · NJD/Love to Play · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathleen Wallace
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
Teams12 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
32%
16W–34L · 47.9% of games
3.5
50%
3W–3L · 47.4% of games
6.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
13 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer