← Search

Amy Greenberg

Little Silver, NJ
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
212 matches · 133W–79L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Amy Greenberg to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history212 matches
L
2026-08-14 · #4 Doubles · with Margalit Edelman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-09 · #3 Doubles · with Monica Slattery championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-5
W
2026-05-27 · SHORE/Act Your Age · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michele Gioia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-05-06 · SHORE/Act Your Age · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Meegan Fitzgerald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-05-04 · Great Dames · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sarah MacKay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-24 · Game Changers · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cynthia Galvin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-04-20 · Great Dames · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lynn di Gioia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-15 · SHORE/Act Your Age · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle Cantaffa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-03-27 · Game Changers · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Lasher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-03-26 · Serve and Slay · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Lasher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-19 · Serve and Slay · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christina Longo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-13 · Game Changers · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meegan Fitzgerald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
72.1%
49W–19L · 56.4% of games
3.5
60.3%
70W–46L · 52.9% of games
7.0
66.7%
6W–3L · 59.6% of games
8.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
50%
6W–6L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
84 matches
#1 Doubles
34%
71 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
55 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer