← Search

Michele Brammer

— year-end
187 matches · 142W–45L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Michele Brammer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history187 matches
W
2026-06-14 · Team 1 High Rollers · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Todd Campbell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 5-2
W
2026-04-25 · #2 Doubles · with Marek Slojewski championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-04-25 · #2 Doubles · with Marek Slojewski championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-04-16 · Team 1 High Rollers · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Sheikh Ahmed mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-03-08 · Macher - Smart Aces · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer McGraw
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-03-03 · Vissering - Grounded & Lobs · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mary Papadopulos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
Byron Levy / Jennifer Mitchell
2025-12-11 · Lee - Super Sac Sac · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Matthew Geppi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2025-11-13 · Lee - Super Sac Sac · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Marek Slojewski mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
Matti Teittinen / Michelle Liang
2025-11-09 · #2 Doubles · with Leonard Tetteh championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2025-11-09 · #1 Doubles · with Leonard Tetteh championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Marcin Strojwas / Ann Graff
2025-11-07 · #3 Doubles · with Leonard Tetteh championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-11-05 · Lee - Super Sac Sac · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Matthew Geppi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-5
Teams92 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level13 levels played
0.0
100%
5W–0L · 67% of games
4.0
85.7%
12W–2L · 65.7% of games
4.5
62.1%
18W–11L · 55.4% of games
7.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 67% of games
8.5
80%
8W–2L · 60.4% of games
0.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 52.2% of games
4.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 62.7% of games
7.0mixed
100%
7W–0L · 77% of games
7.5mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 59.8% of games
8.0mixed
88.9%
16W–2L · 71.6% of games
8.5mixed
100%
9W–0L · 63.6% of games
9.0mixed
65.8%
25W–13L · 53.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
72 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
59 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
47 matches
#1 Singles
4%
7 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer