← Search

Nathaniel Long

— year-end
168 matches · 77W–91L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Nathaniel Long to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history168 matches
W
2026-05-17 · Elysium · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dan Poptic
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-05-10 · Elysium · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Milan Pereira
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-03 · Elysium · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-04-26 · Elysium · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Todd Glover
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-04-19 · Elysium · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matt Young
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-18 · Elysium · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Milan Pereira
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
Michael Thomas / Chip Huth
2026-04-12 · Elysium · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sean Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-3
W
2026-04-11 · Elysium · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-03-22 · Elysium · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sean Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-03-21 · Elysium · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Bob Gawronski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
W
KIREN MANOHARAN
2026-03-15 · Elysium · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-14 · Elysium · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Khuong Pham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
Teams31 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
49.6%
70W–71L · 49.3% of games
4.5
13.3%
2W–13L · 27.3% of games
8.5
41.7%
5W–7L · 47.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 39% of the time
#1 Singles
39%
65 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
36 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
33 matches
#2 Singles
10%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
17 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams