← Search

Dan Poptic

Dublin, OH
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
121 matches · 59W–62L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Dan Poptic to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history121 matches
W
2026-05-17 · Elysium · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nathaniel Long
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-03-15 · Elysium · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sean Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-7
W
2026-03-08 · Elysium · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Todd Glover
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
L
2026-03-01 · Elysium · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jed Aston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-5, 1-0
W
2026-02-21 · Elysium · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Kilgren
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
Phillip Krayterman
2026-02-15 · Elysium · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-01 · Elysium · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jed Aston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-01-18 · Elysium · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sean Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2025-11-08 · Elysium · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nick Bednar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-11-02 · Elysium · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
W
2025-10-25 · Elysium · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
Bradley Hensley / Michael Thomas
2025-10-19 · Elysium · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jed Aston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
68%
51W–24L · 55.3% of games
4.5
16.7%
7W–35L · 40.8% of games
8.5
25%
1W–3L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
49 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
21 matches
#2 Singles
12%
15 matches
#1 Singles
12%
14 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova