← Search

Mary Green-Zwemke

Sherwood, OR
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
321 matches · 217W–104L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Mary Green-Zwemke to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history321 matches
W
2026-09-11 · LOTC-Ferrer/Berkman · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jaime Perez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-08-09 · WHRC-Green-Zwemke/Pham · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Renato Bernasconi Zuccari mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-26 · Craft+Chaos · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rebecca Yu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-07-25 · LOTC-Green-Zwemke/Carpio · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ryan Patterson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-24 · LOTC-Green-Zwemke/Carpio · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Peter Johnson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-23 · Craft+Chaos · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rebecca Yu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-07-22 · Craft+Chaos · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rebecca Yu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-19 · LOTC-Green-Zwemke/Carpio · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robert Glenn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-19 · Craft+Chaos · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rebecca Yu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-07-18 · WHRC-Green-Zwemke/Pham · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jimmy Shen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-15 · Craft+Chaos · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rebecca Yu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
L
2026-07-13 · Craft+Chaos · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rebecca Yu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams62 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
82.4%
14W–3L · 67.1% of games
3.5
88.5%
23W–3L · 70.5% of games
4.0
75.8%
25W–8L · 64% of games
4.5
51.4%
36W–34L · 49.8% of games
3.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
50%
4W–4L · 56.9% of games
7.0mixed
85.2%
23W–4L · 63.1% of games
8.0mixed
75%
30W–10L · 60.1% of games
9.0mixed
54.1%
20W–17L · 51.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
127 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
76 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
54 matches
#1 Singles
16%
50 matches
#2 Singles
3%
11 matches
#1 Female Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams