← Search

Maggie Desai

— year-end
157 matches · 115W–42L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Maggie Desai to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history157 matches
W
2026-05-05 · Yalavarthi/Bryan (SD) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kayla Nieman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-04-21 · Yalavarthi/Bryan (SD) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shannon Bryan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-04-07 · Yalavarthi/Bryan (SD) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie Spencer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-03-31 · Yalavarthi/Bryan (SD) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nancy Kraemer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-10 · Yalavarthi/Bryan (SD) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Bartling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-03 · Yalavarthi/Bryan (SD) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nancy Kraemer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-02-17 · Yalavarthi/Bryan (SD) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Keri Shuert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-01-04 · Hannah/Clifford (F) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tara Freese Clifford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-12-16 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Bartling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-5, 1-0
W
2025-12-07 · Hannah/Clifford (F) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tara Freese Clifford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2025-12-03 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Handley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2025-12-02 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shannon Bryan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Teams34 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
74.5%
35W–12L · 61.1% of games
3.5
74.5%
70W–24L · 60.6% of games
4.0
62.5%
10W–6L · 55.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
62 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
51 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
36 matches
#1 Singles
3%
4 matches
#2 Singles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams