← Search

Desiree Wojciechowski

Saint Louis, MO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
263 matches · 99W–164L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Desiree Wojciechowski to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history263 matches
L
2026-04-15 · Tokarczyk/McMillan (SD) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margaret Wright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-04-14 · Kantrovitz (SD) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anne Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-12 · Hannah/Clifford (S) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margaret Wright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-5, 1-0
W
2026-04-08 · Tokarczyk/McMillan (SD) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margaret Wright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-03-25 · Tokarczyk/McMillan (SD) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margaret Wright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-03-22 · Hannah/Clifford (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margaret Wright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-18 · Tokarczyk/McMillan (SD) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margaret Wright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-03-17 · Kantrovitz (SD) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Cancila
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-11 · Tokarczyk/McMillan (SD) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shelley Logan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-03-08 · Hannah/Clifford (S) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jamie Cregger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-04 · Tokarczyk/McMillan (SD) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meaghan Hoffmeister
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-03-03 · Kantrovitz (SD) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Margaret Wright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams53 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
47.6%
89W–98L · 48.4% of games
4.0
13.9%
10W–62L · 33.7% of games
7.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 22.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 32% of the time
#2 Doubles
32%
84 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
80 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
59 matches
#2 Singles
13%
34 matches
#1 Singles
2%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams