← Search

Irene Quilez

Midlothian, VA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
45 matches · 14W–31L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Irene Quilez to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history45 matches
L
2026-09-11 · ACAC Quilez · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dawn Toft
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-09 · ACAC Callaghan · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Courtney Rosenthal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-25 · ACAC Quilez · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katherine Guerette
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-21 · ACAC Quilez · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dawn Toft
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-08-19 · ACAC Callaghan · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bhel Bueta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-18 · ACAC Callaghan · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-12 · ACAC Callaghan · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Bufford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-27 · ACAC The Slice Girls Lutterbie/King · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dawn Kelsey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-06-26 · 2 ACAC Hoefer/Camden · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Landrum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-4
L
2026-06-20 · ACAC The Slice Girls Lutterbie/King · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Natalie Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-06-14 · ACAC The Slice Girls Lutterbie/King · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carol Pfeiffer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-12 · 2 ACAC Hoefer/Camden · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carol Pfeiffer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
27.6%
8W–21L · 41.8% of games
5.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
50%
2W–2L · 57.1% of games
7.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 49.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 51% of the time
#2 Doubles
51%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
8 matches
#2 Singles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer