← Search

Candra McRae

Columbus, GA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
107 matches · 80W–27L · seasons 2024–2027

Captains: add Candra McRae to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history107 matches
W
2026-09-13 · Pease/Smith-CCC · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-08-31 · Johnson-CC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with India Hudson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
India Hudson / Karen Brown
2026-08-30 · Galbraith/Averett-GI · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Fletcher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-13 · Smith-CC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Gail Burgos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-12 · Caraveo/Vaughn-GI · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Shannon Galligan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
W
2026-07-26 · Smith-CC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rebecca DeLoach
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-21 · Johnson-CC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ana Osborne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-07-18 · Caraveo/Vaughn-GI · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Shannon Galligan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-12 · Smith-CC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Gail Burgos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-11 · Caraveo/Vaughn-GI · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jill Gordy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-09 · Smith-CC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Gail Burgos
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-06-25 · Lynch/Desai-GI · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Forrest Champion
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams49 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
93.8%
15W–1L · 70.3% of games
3.0
76.1%
35W–11L · 62.9% of games
3.5
60.9%
14W–9L · 54.1% of games
4.0
58.3%
7W–5L · 50.4% of games
6.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 61.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 28% of the time
#1 Singles
28%
30 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
23 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
21 matches
#2 Singles
8%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer