← Search

Ann Pham

Las Vegas, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
197 matches · 135W–62L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Ann Pham to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history197 matches
W
2026-08-25 · TPC #2 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amanda Zommick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-08-11 · TPC #2 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amanda Zommick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
L
2026-07-14 · TPC #2 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Teddy Stantcheva
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-02 · DTC #1 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Zommick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-04-25 · DTC #1 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erin Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-03-28 · DTC #1 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erin Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-03-21 · DTC #1 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Zommick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-1
L
2025-12-13 · DTC #1 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Huong Nardelli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2025-12-06 · DTC #1 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Teddy Stantcheva
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2025-11-22 · DTC #1 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Huong Nardelli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2025-11-15 · DTC #1 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Huong Nardelli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
2025-10-25 · DTC #1 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Donna Isaacs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams51 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
69.2%
9W–4L · 60.8% of games
3.0
76.9%
20W–6L · 63.8% of games
3.5
74.5%
35W–12L · 61% of games
4.0
60%
39W–26L · 53.6% of games
4.5
10%
1W–9L · 28.9% of games
6.0mixed
84.6%
11W–2L · 71.2% of games
6.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
91.7%
11W–1L · 74.6% of games
7.5mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 61.4% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 33% of the time
#3 Doubles
33%
64 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
51 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
50 matches
#1 Singles
12%
24 matches
#2 Singles
3%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert