← Search

Stephanie Anania

— year-end
75 matches · 40W–35L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Stephanie Anania to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history75 matches
W
2026-07-12 · IA/Tekippe/18&Over6.0X · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jeff Monson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-05-31 · IA/Tekippe/18&Over6.0X · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jeff Monson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-05-16 · IA/Scuffham-Anania/18&Over3.0W · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-15 · IA/Beebe-Bangtson/18&Over3.5W · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Miriam Levitt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-09 · IA/Scuffham-Anania/18&Over3.0W · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Holly Adams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-04-24 · IA/Scuffham-Anania/18&Over3.0W · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Holly Adams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-04-11 · IA/Scuffham-Anania/18&Over3.0W · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Becky Eaton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-29 · IA/Avilez/40&Over7.0X · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Helmich mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-03-21 · IA/Beebe-Bangtson/18&Over3.5W · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-02-28 · IA/Scuffham-Anania/18&Over3.0W · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Alexandra Haeberle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-02-14 · IA/Scuffham-Anania/18&Over3.0W · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-01-25 · IA/Avilez/40&Over7.0X · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Helmich mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
Teams35 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
61.8%
21W–13L · 53.8% of games
3.5
28.6%
4W–10L · 40.9% of games
6.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 63.9% of games
7.0mixed
52.9%
9W–8L · 50.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 29% of the time
#3 Doubles
29%
22 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
13 matches
#2 Singles
16%
12 matches
#1 Singles
11%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer