← Search

Jeff Hightshoe

Iowa City, IA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
51 matches · 29W–22L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Jeff Hightshoe to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history51 matches
L
2026-07-12 · Ross · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lyla Schweiger mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-21 · Ross · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Tracy Hightshoe mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-03-28 · IA/Nesteby-Schadler/18&Over3.5M · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steve Armstrong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-02-22 · Hightshoe/Infelt · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeff Dotson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-02-21 · IA/Nesteby-Schadler/18&Over3.5M · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeff Schadler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-02-01 · IA/Sichterman/55&Over8.0M · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Thomas Wolle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-01-25 · Hightshoe/Infelt · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeff Dotson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-01-17 · IA/Nesteby-Schadler/18&Over3.5M · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steven Nesteby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-0, 0-1
L
2026-01-11 · Hightshoe/Infelt · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steve Armstrong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-01-10 · Hightshoe & Schadler: NDAC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anil Marian
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-12-14 · Hightshoe/Infelt · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steve Armstrong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2025-11-22 · Hightshoe & Schadler: NDAC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Doug Lestina
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
53.3%
16W–14L · 49.8% of games
7.0
58.8%
10W–7L · 55% of games
8.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
12 matches
#1 Singles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert