← Search

Anita Trigg

Brandon, MS
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
165 matches · 74W–91L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Anita Trigg to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history165 matches
L
2026-08-27 · Sykes, Joanna · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tiffany Gore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-19 · Sims, Ginny · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ginny Sims
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-08-13 · Sykes, Joanna · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kimberly Wooten
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-11 · Brewer, Connie · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Iona Remulta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-06 · R A Y B O R N · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Peggy Givens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-05 · Sims, Ginny · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kimberly Wooten
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-07-18 · Brewer, Connie · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Polly Moon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-5
W
2026-07-16 · Walters, Eric · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jerry Sloan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-07-11 · Brewer, Connie · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jane Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-07-06 · Donaldson, Missy · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leigh Anne Coleman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-13 · Walters, Eric · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Eric Walters mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-04 · Donaldson, Missy · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Missy Donaldson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams105 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 50% of games
3.0
62.5%
45W–27L · 52.4% of games
3.5
16.7%
3W–15L · 33.8% of games
5.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 60.2% of games
6.5
52.2%
12W–11L · 50.3% of games
7.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
31.6%
6W–13L · 41.1% of games
3.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 33% of games
7.0mixed
0%
0W–8L · 23.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 42% of the time
#3 Doubles
42%
69 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
48 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
47 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert