← Search

Angie Pletzke

Clinton, MS
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
68 matches · 26W–42L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Angie Pletzke to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history68 matches
W
2026-09-09 · Bryan, Emily · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Mary Parker Plunkett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-02 · Bryan, Emily · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Emily Mangum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-26 · Morales, Brittany · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Roberlyn Searcy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-19 · Morales, Brittany · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tina Murphy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
Lindsey Fonville / Toni Harris
2026-08-12 · Bryan, Emily · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Johnna Valentine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-08-05 · Morales, Brittany · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Katie Bumgarner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-07 · Mangum, Emily · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Mary Whitehead
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-30 · Mangum, Emily · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Samantha Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-29 · Mangum, Emily · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Samantha Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-19 · Mangum, Emily · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Sallie Marie Campbell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-1
W
2026-05-12 · Mangum, Emily · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Ashley Scarbrough
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-05-05 · Mangum, Emily · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jaime van Dan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
48.7%
19W–20L · 50.2% of games
3.0
33.3%
5W–10L · 47.7% of games
5.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 45.7% of games
6.5
0%
0W–8L · 35.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
22 matches
#1 Singles
28%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
6 matches
#2 Singles
7%
5 matches
#3 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe