← Search

Terra Hovan

Melbourne, FL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
179 matches · 108W–71L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Terra Hovan to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history179 matches
L
2026-08-24 · RCCB - Vickers · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Samantha Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-10 · RCCB - Vickers · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Megan Holthaus
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-03 · RCCB - Vickers · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sue Lutter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-27 · RCCB - Vickers · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sue Lutter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-06-12 · RCCB - Heyn · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with SHANE BYRNE mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-26 · RCCB - Heyn · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brent Traina mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
W
Diana Sierra
2026-02-06 · Terra Hovan · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-0, 1-0
L
Shannel Smith
2026-01-21 · Terra Hovan · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-01-11 · Terra Hovan · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-09-22 · EFSC - Leiter · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Bonita Madden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2025-08-13 · EFSC - Leiter · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Trisha Watson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
Lori Abbott / Danielle Hyatt
2025-07-27 · EFSC - Taylor · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Kressler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
80.6%
25W–6L · 69.2% of games
3.0
64.1%
25W–14L · 56.7% of games
3.5
56.9%
29W–22L · 52.1% of games
4.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
5.5
72.7%
8W–3L · 59.3% of games
6.5
50%
7W–7L · 50.9% of games
7.5
25%
1W–3L · 46.7% of games
6.0mixed
75%
9W–3L · 59.7% of games
7.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 32.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
75 matches
#1 Singles
23%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
24 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert