← Search

Christina Kopp

Satellite Beach, FL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
119 matches · 68W–51L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Christina Kopp to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history119 matches
W
2026-08-10 · EFSC - Simmons · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Gena Wools
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-27 · EFSC - Simmons · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Anne Ramsey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-21 · Kiwi - Ramsey · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Benjamin Smith mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-14 · Kiwi - Ramsey · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Benjamin Smith mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-07 · Kiwi - Ramsey · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Matthew Gaboury mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-29 · Kiwi - Ramsey · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Matthew Gaboury mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-20 · #3 Doubles · with Benjamin Smith championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-06-20 · #2 Doubles · with Benjamin Smith championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
Luke Anderson / Megan McAloon
2026-06-19 · #2 Doubles · with Benjamin Smith championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-10 · Kiwi - Ramsey · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Matthew Gaboury mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-05-26 · Kiwi - Ramsey · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Benjamin Smith mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
Daniel Evans / Michelle Smith
2026-05-19 · Kiwi - Ramsey · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Matthew Gaboury mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
60.9%
28W–18L · 53.6% of games
4.0
30.8%
4W–9L · 44.9% of games
6.5
66.7%
8W–4L · 59.6% of games
7.5
42.9%
6W–8L · 49.8% of games
7.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 64.7% of games
8.0mixed
61.9%
13W–8L · 52.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
50 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
23 matches
#1 Singles
6%
7 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams