← Search

Dana Katz

Englewood, CO
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
17 matches · 2W–15L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Dana Katz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history17 matches
L
2026-08-03 · ATC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Pucillo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-22 · ATC RED · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Forsey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-15 · ATC RED · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Forsey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-08 · ATC RED · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Harriet LaMair
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-11 · ATC GREEN · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jennifer Thomson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-11 · ATC GREEN · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nicole Carner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-20 · ATC GREEN · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Keely Downs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-06-23 · ATC RED · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Chris Fisher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-06-16 · ATC RED · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Bryan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-04-21 · ATC GREEN · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Allison Dodge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2021-04-03 · GCC NAVY · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2019-06-25 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lori Marks-Connors
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
3.0
11.8%
2W–15L · 34.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 77% of the time
#3 Doubles
77%
13 matches
#2 Singles
12%
2 matches
#1 Singles
6%
1 match
#2 Doubles
6%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer