← Search

Anne Campbell

Centennial, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
87 matches · 54W–33L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Anne Campbell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history87 matches
W
2026-08-31 · GAC RED · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kris Stern
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-24 · GAC RED · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rebecca Givens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-08-23 · GAC BLUE · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Bret Hansen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-10 · GAC RED · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lesley Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-08-09 · GAC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Bret Hansen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-03 · GAC RED · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rebecca Givens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-07-27 · GAC RED · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kris Stern
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-26 · GAC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jason Wagner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-25 · #3 Doubles · with Jerry Augustin championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
L
2026-07-13 · GAC RED · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ruth Mantle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-11 · GAC BLUE · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jason Wagner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-06 · GAC RED · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Katie Donohue
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
59.1%
26W–18L · 53.6% of games
3.0
66.7%
14W–7L · 53.9% of games
5.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
75%
9W–3L · 64.6% of games
6.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 41.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
32 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
20 matches
#1 Singles
7%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer