← Search

Jordan Spinosa

— year-end
30 matches · 25W–5L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Jordan Spinosa to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history30 matches
W
2026-09-02 · Abrams-18/6.5/M-StoneCreek · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jared Matherne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-06 · Abrams-18/6.5/M-StoneCreek · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jake Springer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-07-29 · Matherne-Appe/18s/4.0,3.5,3.0-STNCK · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dane Landry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
Javier Rodriguez / Amber Mata
2026-07-24 · Englert/18s/3.5/SC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jamie Quartano mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-07-15 · Matherne-Appe/18s/4.0,3.5,3.0-STNCK · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kannon Otillio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-03 · Matherne-Appe/18s/4.0,3.5,3.0-STNCK · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carson Abrams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
L
2026-05-13 · Spinoza/Appe- 18/3.5/M/StoneCreek · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ben Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-07 · Spinoza/Appe- 18/3.5/M/StoneCreek · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ben Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-04 · Spinoza/Appe- 18/3.5/M/StoneCreek · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paul Roy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-04-01 · Spinoza/Appe- 18/3.5/M/StoneCreek · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paul Roy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2025-08-27 · Abrams 18/6.5/M/StoneCreek · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jake Springer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
W
2025-08-16 · Abrams 18/6.5/M/StoneCreek · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Carson Abrams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
Teams19 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
71.4%
10W–4L · 55.2% of games
6.5
80%
4W–1L · 62.5% of games
3.5mixed
100%
11W–0L · 61.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 50% of the time
#2 Doubles
50%
15 matches
#1 Doubles
37%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
3 matches
#1 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova