← Search

Jared Matherne

Hammond, LA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
80 matches · 51W–29L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Jared Matherne to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history80 matches
W
2026-09-02 · Abrams-18/6.5/M-StoneCreek · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jordan Spinosa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-06 · Abrams-18/6.5/M-StoneCreek · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with David Appe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-31 · Smith/18s/3.0/SC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mallory Skarica mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-07-29 · Matherne-Appe/18s/4.0,3.5,3.0-STNCK · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nick Bowers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-27 · Smith/18s/3.0/SC · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Taylor Fernandez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-23 · Smith/18s/3.0/SC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lacey Schwab mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-06-17 · Matherne-Appe/18s/4.0,3.5,3.0-STNCK · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nick Bowers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-05-15 · Smith/18s/3.0/SC · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Taylor Fernandez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-05-12 · Matherne-18/3.0/M/StoneCreek · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jake Springer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-04-04 · Matherne-18/3.0/M/StoneCreek · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nick Casten
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-03-28 · Matherne-18/3.0/M/StoneCreek · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nick Bowers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-03-21 · Matherne-18/3.0/M/StoneCreek · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Peyton Vitellaro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
70%
21W–9L · 56.4% of games
3.5
30%
3W–7L · 40.6% of games
5.5
90%
9W–1L · 67.7% of games
6.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 54.2% of games
3.0mixed
73.3%
11W–4L · 59.9% of games
3.5mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 37.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
33 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
21 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King