← Search

Rahul Bhatnagar

Ann Arbor, MI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
152 matches · 114W–38L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Rahul Bhatnagar to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history152 matches
L
2026-08-12 · LIB-Rosenwasser 7.5 COMBO MIX · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kerri-Ann Croftchik mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
David Sutts / Nick Johnson
2026-08-02 · #2 Doubles · with Shepard Peir Johnson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-07-22 · LIB-Kornfeld 18s 3.5M F4 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shepard Peir Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
N/A
2026-07-13 · LIB-Briceno 40s 4.0M F1 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-23 · LIB-St Pierre 18s 4.0M F2 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-17 · LIB-Kornfeld 18s 3.5M F4 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shepard Peir Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-12 · LIB-Marley 18s 7.0X F · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Qi Gao mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-08 · HV-Bahrou 40s 3.5M F3 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shepard Peir Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-05 · LIB-Marley 18s 7.0X F · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Qi Gao mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-29 · LIB-Briceno 40s 4.0M F1 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Theriot
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-05-29 · LIB-Marley 18s 7.0X F · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Colleen Hughes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
Mostansar Virk / Jason Stadtherr
2026-05-15 · LIB-Briceno 40s 4.0M F1 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dorran Dihle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams68 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
0.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
2.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
86.1%
31W–5L · 65.2% of games
4.0
61.1%
11W–7L · 53.8% of games
6.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
100%
5W–0L · 60.2% of games
7.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
87.5%
21W–3L · 67.1% of games
7.5mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 56.6% of games
8.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 51.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
54 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
44 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
32 matches
#1 Singles
7%
11 matches
#2 Singles
6%
9 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe