← Search

Cori Peng

Ann Arbor, MI
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
128 matches · 84W–44L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Cori Peng to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history128 matches
W
2026-08-31 · HV-Watson 7.5 COMBO MIX F · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Howard Weingarden mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-08-10 · HV-Watson 7.5 COMBO MIX F · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Howard Weingarden mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-04 · HV-King 18s 7.0X F · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Peng mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-02 · #1 Doubles · with Jeanne Cooper championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-08-01 · #2 Doubles · with Christine Hume championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-09 · RCAA-Lamphear (doubles clay) 40s 4.0 NW F1 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kaitlyn Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-07-08 · HV-Sober 18s 3.5 NW F1 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Preston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
N/A
2026-06-29 · HV-King 40s 3.5 NW F2 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deana Shields
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-16 · VTC-Haessler (indoor) 40s 3.5 DW F1 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-06-11 · RCAA-Lamphear (doubles clay) 40s 4.0 NW F1 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Roopa Gurm
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-06-10 · HV-Sober 18s 3.5 NW F1 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Preston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-06-05 · HV-King 18s 7.0X F · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Peng mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams56 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
0.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
85.7%
12W–2L · 62.3% of games
3.5
71.4%
35W–14L · 59.1% of games
4.0
37.5%
3W–5L · 48.4% of games
6.0
100%
4W–0L · 70.8% of games
6.5
66.7%
6W–3L · 59.9% of games
7.0
91.7%
11W–1L · 65.1% of games
6.0mixed
80%
4W–1L · 64.2% of games
7.0mixed
37.5%
6W–10L · 46.6% of games
7.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 31% of the time
#2 Doubles
31%
40 matches
#1 Singles
26%
33 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
11 matches
#2 Singles
8%
10 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert