← Search

Sam Rim

— year-end
64 matches · 49W–15L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Sam Rim to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history64 matches
L
2026-06-28 · JMTA All Stars · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paul Haydon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-27 · JMTA All Stars · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shivi Jain
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2023-10-18 · Choy · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian Rosenfeld
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2023-10-10 · Choy · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian Rosenfeld
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2023-04-22 · 2LIB-KORNFELD Team Singles 3.5 Men SEM F1 · #3 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
Michael Sanchez / Isaac Vis
2023-02-25 · #1 Doubles · with Alexander Fabiszewski championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W
2023-02-18 · 2LIB-KORNFELD Team Singles 3.5 Men SEM F1 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-1
W
2023-02-05 · 2LIB-KORNFELD Team Singles 3.5 Men SEM F1 · #3 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2022-12-16 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jon Houston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2022-11-11 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Gowri Shankar Shekar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2022-10-15 · 1LIB-ATKISON 30 M FALL SINGLES SEM · #1 Singles · 6.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2022-10-15 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Bret Schofield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
Teams18 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
100%
5W–0L · 77.9% of games
3.0
81.8%
9W–2L · 63.2% of games
3.5
61.5%
8W–5L · 53% of games
6.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 54.4% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
88.9%
8W–1L · 69.2% of games
7.0mixed
100%
5W–0L · 73.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 31% of the time
#2 Doubles
31%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
18 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
14 matches
#2 Singles
9%
6 matches
#1 Singles
6%
4 matches
#3 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams