← Search

Robert Pees

— year-end
132 matches · 60W–72L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Robert Pees to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history132 matches
W
2026-08-03 · Metro: Helene/Katz · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeff Ravetz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-29 · Metro: Helene/Katz · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Isagani Soriano Aves
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-09 · Pham/Pees · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tabber Benedict
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-28 · Pham/Pees · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tabber Benedict
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-06-25 · Pham/Pees · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tabber Benedict
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-5
L
2026-06-16 · Pham/Pees · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
Anh Nguyen / Adrian Tong
2026-05-27 · Pham/Pees · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tabber Benedict
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-3
W
2026-05-20 · Pham/Pees · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tabber Benedict
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-05-13 · Pham/Pees · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-03 · Pham/Pees · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mel Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-04-12 · Pham · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian Polen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-15 · Pham · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Isaac Halpern
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
Teams22 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
2.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
49.5%
50W–51L · 48.3% of games
4.0
0%
0W–5L · 29.3% of games
8.0
50%
2W–2L · 49.3% of games
7.0mixed
31.2%
5W–11L · 43.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
49 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
19 matches
#2 Singles
13%
17 matches
#1 Singles
10%
13 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King