← Search

Danielle Munk

Rocky River, OH
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
49 matches · 20W–29L · seasons 2019–2025

Captains: add Danielle Munk to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history49 matches
W
2025-04-04 · A18 3.0W MM2 Reid · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nile Whaley-Garrison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2025-02-21 · A18 3.0W MM2 Reid · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Colleen Lenhard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
Sarah Kennedy / Jane Shami
2024-11-10 · C 6.5W PW2 Lawrence · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brooke Kelsey
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 0-6
L
2024-10-06 · C 6.5W PW2 Lawrence · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Colleen Lenhard
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 0-6, 0-1
W
2024-07-13 · A18 3.0W WCC McFarland · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emily King
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2024-07-01 · A18 3.0W WCC McFarland · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rachel van Meter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2024-06-27 · A18 3.0W WCC McFarland · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Colleen Lenhard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2024-06-25 · A18 3.0W WCC McFarland · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
2024-06-24 · A18 3.0W WCC McFarland · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephanie Bagshaw
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2024-06-10 · A18 3.0W WCC McFarland · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2024-06-03 · A18 3.0W WCC McFarland · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2024-05-13 · A18 3.0W WCC McFarland · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rachel van Meter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2021–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
46.9%
15W–17L · 50.2% of games
3.5
20%
2W–8L · 38.6% of games
6.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 43.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 41% of the time
#1 Singles
41%
20 matches
#2 Singles
18%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
8 matches
#1 Doubles
12%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
12%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova