← Search

Rachel van Meter

— year-end
162 matches · 101W–61L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Rachel van Meter to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history162 matches
L
2026-07-15 · A40 4.0W WCC Vitou · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Kilbane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-07-09 · A18 3.5W PW2 Rummel · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Scott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-07-08 · A40 4.0W WCC Vitou · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Kilbane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-06-30 · A40 3.5W WCC Moritz · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Teresa Hardy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-06-17 · A40 4.0W WCC Vitou · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Kilbane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-04 · A18 3.5W PW2 Rummel · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Scott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-27 · A40 4.0W WCC Vitou · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Kilbane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-26 · A40 3.5W WCC Moritz · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Teresa Hardy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-05-20 · A40 4.0W WCC Vitou · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-13 · A40 4.0W WCC Vitou · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cristine Torek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-07-21 · A18 3.5W PW3 Rummel · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diane Blesi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2025-07-17 · A40 4.0W 2 WCC Vitou · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Kilbane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
Teams41 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
73.1%
38W–14L · 59.9% of games
3.5
56.4%
22W–17L · 54.1% of games
4.0
12.5%
2W–14L · 37.3% of games
5.5
100%
5W–0L · 82.2% of games
6.5
69%
20W–9L · 61.9% of games
7.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 53.3% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 61.7% of games
7.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 48.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
65 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
49 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
28 matches
#4 Doubles
11%
17 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert