← Search

Laura Leetzow

— year-end
45 matches · 31W–14L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Laura Leetzow to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history45 matches
W
2026-06-19 · BHSC - Leetzow · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Achilles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-05 · BHSC - Leetzow · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Achilles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
Suellen Aldina / Chris Bailey
2026-05-29 · BHSC - Leetzow · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Marcy MacGovern
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-6
W
2026-05-15 · BHSC - Leetzow · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeanne Ward
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-05-11 · BHSC - Leetzow · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeanne Ward
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-05-07 · BHSC - Kelley · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeanne Ward
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-01 · BHSC - Leetzow · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michele Rowan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-08-26 · Merrick - Keswick · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Zeller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2025-07-29 · Merrick - Keswick · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Merrily Main D'Arpino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
W
2025-07-10 · Binko / Henderson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marcy MacGovern
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
2025-05-15 · BHSC-Binko/Ewing · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jenny Furlow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
Elizabeth Gunnels / Deborah Smith
2025-04-25 · BHSC-MacGovern · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jolene Park
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
Teams21 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
64.3%
9W–5L · 54.7% of games
6.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0
88%
22W–3L · 63.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
7 matches
#3 Female Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova