← Search

Erica Mulder

Haworth, NJ
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
41 matches · 22W–19L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Erica Mulder to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history41 matches
W
Vanessa Herrera / Melanie Talesnick
2026-06-17 · Fine Whines · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hannah Finkelberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-06-09 · Fine Whines · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erika Bradley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
W
2026-05-05 · Fine Whines · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathy Hargens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2
L
2026-04-17 · Here Comes Trouble · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jenny Paik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-03 · Here Comes Trouble · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jenny Paik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2025-07-15 · Surick · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lauran Tuck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2025-06-22 · #3 Doubles · with Jenny Paik championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2025-06-21 · #3 Doubles · with Wendy Boiardi championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L
2025-05-09 · Primetime Ballers · #4 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jenny Paik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-5, 0-1
W
2025-04-25 · NJ: Here Comes Trouble · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jenny Paik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2024-10-31 · Centercourt Florham Park 2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jenny Paik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W
2024-06-22 · #3 Doubles · with Jenny Paik championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
54.8%
17W–14L · 51.1% of games
4.5
25%
1W–3L · 34.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
10 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe