← Search

Erika Bradley

Waldwick, NJ
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
35 matches · 12W–23L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Erika Bradley to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history35 matches
W
2026-06-17 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christa DeHuff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6
W
2026-06-09 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erica Mulder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
L
2025-07-22 · Surick · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joanne Surick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-07-08 · Surick · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sally Pillay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-06-24 · Surick · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allison Liss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2025-06-17 · Surick · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patricia Travers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2024-07-16 · Team Rozar/Park · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2024-07-09 · Team Rozar/Park · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christa DeHuff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
L
Wendy Boiardi / Susan Ryan
2024-06-18 · Team Rozar/Park · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Annika Ahlstrom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2024-06-11 · Team Rozar/Park · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Annika Ahlstrom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2023-06-20 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Annika Ahlstrom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2023-06-05 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Annika Ahlstrom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2020–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
33.3%
9W–18L · 43.2% of games
4.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 40.8% of games
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
10 matches
#1 Singles
11%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
3 matches
#2 Singles
6%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal