← Search

Ty Gossett

— year-end
77 matches · 53W–24L · seasons 2019–2022

Captains: add Ty Gossett to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history77 matches
L
2022-07-14 · A18 4.0M B LT Simon · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Adam Hosner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L
2022-07-13 · A18 4.5M B LT Crane · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ward Crane
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2022-06-24 · NEO X18 8.0 Simon · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Caroline Evans mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
W
Kent Smith / David Dilyard
2022-06-23 · A18 4.0M B LT Simon · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jordan Ragland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2022-06-17 · NEO X18 8.0 Simon · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Carly Holloway mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
Steve Mazak / Mike Lee
2022-06-16 · A18 4.0M B LT Simon · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jordan Ragland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2022-06-09 · A18 4.0M B LT Simon · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Adam Hosner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L
2022-06-08 · A18 4.5M B LT Crane · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Douglas Snider
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2022-06-03 · NEO X18 8.0 Simon · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Carly Holloway mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
W
2022-06-02 · A18 4.0M B LT Simon · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Keresztes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2022-05-19 · A18 4.0M B LT Simon · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Adam Hosner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2022-05-12 · A18 4.0M B LT Simon · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Adam Hosner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
Teams19 teams · 2021–2023
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
69.2%
9W–4L · 51.8% of games
4.0
66.7%
8W–4L · 57.6% of games
4.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
83.3%
15W–3L · 66.7% of games
8.5
50%
4W–4L · 52.4% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 52.3% of games
8.0mixed
71.4%
10W–4L · 58.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
31 matches
#2 Doubles
38%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
13 matches
#1 Singles
4%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer