← Search

Adam Hosner

CUYAHOGA FALLS, OH
4.0A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
147 matches · 82W–65L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Adam Hosner to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history147 matches
W
2026-07-31 · X18 9.0 LT Banas · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Shannon Newnes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Nolan Parsons / Thomas Lindsey
2026-07-02 · A18 4.0M 2 LT2 Simon · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeffrey Tong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-11 · A18 4.0M 2 LT2 Simon · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Murphy Dickason
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
Charles Kealy / Vu Nguyen
2026-06-04 · A18 4.0M 2 LT2 Simon · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Tolva
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
Haylee Fearon / Christopher Tunnell
2026-05-29 · X18 9.0 LT Banas · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Shannon Newnes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-05-15 · X18 9.0 LT Banas · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Audrey Gregg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-14 · A18 4.0M 2 LT2 Simon · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nate Fockler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
JJ Burchfield / Tomi Ruzics
2026-04-19 · A18 4.0M LT2 Simon · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Douglas Snider
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-03-20 · A18 4.0M LT2 Simon · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Keresztes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-02-27 · A18 4.0M LT2 Simon · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nate Fockler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-02-22 · Mid Tri M LT Hosner · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mabruk Quabili
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
L
2025-11-21 · C 7.5M LT Derrig · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Matthew Thomas
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
87.1%
27W–4L · 64.5% of games
4.5
36.4%
16W–28L · 46% of games
7.5
54.3%
19W–16L · 52.5% of games
8.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 57.6% of games
8.0mixed
63.6%
7W–4L · 57.2% of games
9.0mixed
33.3%
3W–6L · 46.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 45% of the time
#2 Doubles
45%
66 matches
#3 Doubles
35%
52 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
29 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova