← Search

Deena Emry

Meridian, ID
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
154 matches · 80W–74L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Deena Emry to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history154 matches
W
2026-09-09 · Slice and Dice · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Taylor Lobb mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-26 · Slice and Dice · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Taylor Lobb mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-24 · Slice and Dice · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Taylor Lobb mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-12 · Slice and Dice · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Taylor Lobb mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-17 · Get Smashed · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with River Armstrong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-06-08 · Get Smashed · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Megan Chau
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-05-27 · Get Smashed · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-20 · Get Smashed · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Piper Connelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-09 · Mix and Match · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Taylor Lobb mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-26 · Mix and Match · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Craig Raborn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-04 · Mix and Match · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Taylor Lobb mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-21 · Mix and Match · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Taylor Lobb mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
61.5%
8W–5L · 52.7% of games
3.0
45.8%
38W–45L · 48% of games
3.5
75%
3W–1L · 57.1% of games
5.5mixed
50%
7W–7L · 51.3% of games
6.0mixed
11.1%
1W–8L · 31.5% of games
6.5mixed
90%
9W–1L · 63.9% of games
7.0mixed
60%
6W–4L · 58.7% of games
7.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 53% of the time
#1 Singles
53%
81 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
25 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
17 matches
#2 Singles
5%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert