← Search

Danielle Arens

Dallas, TX
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
11 matches · 4W–7L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Danielle Arens to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history11 matches
W
Heather Evetts / Amy Moore
2026-06-11 · Royal Oaks/Copley-Carter W3.5T · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Fran Matise
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-05-01 · Royal Oaks/Copley-Carter W3.5T · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Dalrymple
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-02-13 · Royal Oaks/Carter W3.5F · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Abbey Carter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-02-05 · Royal Oaks/Carter W3.5F · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Abbey Carter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-01-22 · Royal Oaks/Carter W3.5F · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Abbey Carter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
L
2026-01-16 · Royal Oaks/Carter W3.5F · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Holly Reed
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-01-09 · Royal Oaks/Carter W3.5F · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Holly Reed
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-02-14 · Royal Oaks/Korinek W3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mi Jung Warner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-01-17 · Royal Oaks/Korinek W3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Abbey Carter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2024-11-11 · Royal Oaks/Bradford-Copley W3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Molly Cordell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2024-09-27 · Royal Oaks/Bradford-Copley W3.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Wright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
3.5
36.4%
4W–7L · 52.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 73% of the time
#1 Doubles
73%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
2 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams