← Search

Louise Master

— year-end
58 matches · 36W–22L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Louise Master to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history58 matches
L
2026-06-20 · North Texas RC/Hedblom W3.5S · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Annette Hedblom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-05-30 · North Texas RC/Hedblom W3.5S · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Annette Hedblom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-05-14 · North Texas RC/Weber W4.0T · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Yan Weber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-02 · North Texas RC/Hedblom W3.5S · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Annette Hedblom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-08 · McKinney/Hedblom W3.5S · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ruth Scribner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-06 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Nickerson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
W
2026-02-27 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ana Jordan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-23 · High Point/Master-Simpson W7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dina Patel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-02-22 · McKinney/Hedblom W3.5S · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Annette Hedblom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-02-20 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ruth Scribner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-02-16 · High Point/Master-Simpson W7.0 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Wierwille
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-02-15 · McKinney/Hedblom W3.5S · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ruth Scribner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
Teams50 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
66.7%
18W–9L · 55.6% of games
4.0
52.2%
12W–11L · 49.3% of games
7.0
75%
6W–2L · 55.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
13 matches
#4 Doubles
10%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams