← Search

Brian Polen

Brooklyn, NY
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
44 matches · 19W–25L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Brian Polen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history44 matches
L
2026-04-12 · Pham · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robert Pees
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-02 · Pham · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Long Pham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-01-23 · Pham · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andy Tang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-01-07 · Pham · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Long Pham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2025-12-01 · Pham/Rosner · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Edward Hong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2025-11-10 · Pham/Rosner · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Long Pham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-11-05 · Pham/Rosner · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chris Wofford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2025-09-28 · Pham/Rosner · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robert Pees
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-03-31 · Rosner/Pham · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kevin Bartnik
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
N/A
2025-03-25 · Rosner/Pham · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeff Rea
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2025-02-26 · Rosner/Pham · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Long Pham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2023-03-30 · Pham/Rosner · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Donald Boyd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
47.1%
16W–18L · 49.1% of games
7.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 49.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
39%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova