← Search

Kathleen Wilmot

Pittsford, NY
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
111 matches · 37W–74L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kathleen Wilmot to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history111 matches
L
Grace Williams / Beth Siebert
2026-08-14 · TCR: Gladstone-Brown · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Jane Mulvehill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-13 · Rochester Racquettes · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Elena Hollands
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
Luke Kelley / Melanie Robinson
2026-08-05 · Smash Potatoes · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Brian Stohr mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-5
L
Jing Zhang / Luke Kelley
2026-08-04 · Smash Potatoes · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Anthony Klintworth mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-03 · Double Trouble · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tremaine Jiggetts mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-02 · #2 Doubles · with Elena Hollands championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-08-02 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-31 · TCR: Gladstone-Brown · #3 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Jane Mulvehill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 1-6, 1-0
W
Nicholas Proukou / Amanda Spencer
2026-07-28 · Smash Potatoes · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Brian Stohr mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-28 · Rochester Racquettes · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Amy Bennage
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-07-23 · Rochester Racquettes · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Elena Hollands
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-07-22 · Rochester Racquettes · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Elena Hollands
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
39.1%
9W–14L · 44.3% of games
3.0
29.2%
7W–17L · 39.7% of games
3.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 32.5% of games
6.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 51.4% of games
6.0mixed
31%
9W–20L · 43.7% of games
7.0mixed
22.2%
4W–14L · 34.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 31% of the time
#3 Doubles
31%
34 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
26 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
25 matches
#3 Female Doubles
11%
12 matches
#1 Female Doubles
7%
8 matches
#1 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams