← Search

Cecile Morris

Buffalo, NY
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
123 matches · 58W–65L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Cecile Morris to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history123 matches
L
2026-08-06 · Zagrobelny · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Donna Decarolis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-03 · Wilbon · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Glenn Snowden mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-08-02 · #2 Doubles · with Donna Decarolis championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-08-02 · #1 Doubles · with Rachel Silva championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-07-30 · Zagrobelny · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kelley Vanslander
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-21 · Wilbon · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Glenn Snowden mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-16 · Zagrobelny · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Cynthia Albrecht
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-15 · BUF: Fire Balls · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marilyn Denz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-14 · Blades · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cynthia Albrecht
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-13 · Wilbon · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Glenn Snowden mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-09 · Zagrobelny · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sandra Picerno
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-08 · BUF: Fire Balls · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Donna Decarolis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
57.4%
35W–26L · 55.1% of games
3.5
25%
8W–24L · 40.2% of games
6.0
60%
3W–2L · 48.5% of games
6.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 38.1% of games
7.0mixed
56.2%
9W–7L · 54.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
58 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
31 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova