← Search

Tina Atchley

Lakewood, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
234 matches · 148W–86L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Tina Atchley to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history234 matches
W
2026-08-17 · LTC-M RED · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rebecca BaanHofman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
Elsa Zimmerer / Carolyn Keim
2026-08-03 · LTC-M RED · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christina Santino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-08-02 · LTC-M BLUE · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Zachary Knaus mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-08-01 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-29 · LTC-M YELLOW · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-27 · LTC-M RED · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christina Santino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-19 · LTC-M BLUE · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Stephen Schulte mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-15 · LTC-M YELLOW · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Christina Santino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-13 · LTC-M PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rebecca BaanHofman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-07-06 · LTC-M PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rebecca BaanHofman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-07-01 · LTC-M YELLOW · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rebecca BaanHofman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-06-29 · LTC-M PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rebecca BaanHofman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams50 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
61.2%
30W–19L · 55.5% of games
2.5
67.6%
46W–22L · 58.1% of games
3.0
62.5%
35W–21L · 52.1% of games
3.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5mixed
72.7%
8W–3L · 59.6% of games
6.0mixed
65.2%
15W–8L · 53.7% of games
6.5mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 52.5% of games
7.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
83 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
58 matches
#1 Female Doubles
11%
26 matches
#1 Singles
9%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
22 matches
#1 Female Singles
6%
14 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams