← Search

Kimberly Salazar Suman

Golden, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
127 matches · 83W–44L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kimberly Salazar Suman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history127 matches
W
Michelle McDonald / Kristin Chapman
2026-08-16 · #2 Doubles · with Lauren Carpenter championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Lauren Carpenter championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-08-14 · #2 Doubles · with Lauren Carpenter championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
Heather la Montagne / Jennifer Parsons
2026-08-14 · #3 Doubles · with Kolleen Konecny championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-08-05 · RHCC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emily Weiland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
Sarah Monzyk / Tracy Klein
2026-08-01 · #2 Doubles · with Lauren Carpenter championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-20 · RHCC RED · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emily Weiland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-07-15 · RHCC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Heather Frick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-13 · RHCC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kolleen Konecny
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-12 · RHCC GREEN · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lauren Carpenter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-08 · RHCC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emily Weiland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-07-01 · RHCC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lauren Carpenter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
0.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 43.6% of games
3.0
72.2%
70W–27L · 58% of games
6.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 49.3% of games
7.0mixed
25%
2W–6L · 40.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
51 matches
#2 Doubles
39%
50 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
20 matches
#1 Female Doubles
5%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer