← Search

Johannes Steenekamp

— year-end
103 matches · 65W–38L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Johannes Steenekamp to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history103 matches
L
2026-09-12 · Morillo 18+ 7.5 Combo · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Joseph Pfaff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-29 · Morillo 18+ 7.5 Combo · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Nicolas Morillo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-08-15 · Morillo 18+ 7.5 Combo · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Thomas Weldon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-05-19 · Basta/Mcmanus · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-05-05 · Basta/Mcmanus · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rob Romero
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-27 · Basta/Mcmanus · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elijah Warren
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-18 · Basta/Mcmanus · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Johannes Haasbroek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-11 · Basta/Mcmanus · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Edwin Wagenseller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
W
2026-04-06 · Basta/Mcmanus · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elijah Warren
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
2025-09-03 · LTA-Q RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jim Piccolini
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2025-08-20 · LTA-Q RED · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paul Franko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2025-08-13 · LTA-Q RED · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paul Franko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
Teams25 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
90.9%
10W–1L · 64.9% of games
4.0
51.3%
20W–19L · 50.6% of games
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
78.6%
11W–3L · 54.3% of games
7.5mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 47.7% of games
8.0mixed
77.8%
14W–4L · 55.1% of games
8.5mixed
40%
2W–3L · 54.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 39% of the time
#1 Doubles
39%
40 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
17 matches
#1 Singles
10%
10 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert