← Search

Joshua Kleinstuber

Wilmington, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
100 matches · 63W–37L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Joshua Kleinstuber to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history100 matches
W
2026-09-12 · Manfredi/Gillespie · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Corbin Carroll
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-08-15 · Manfredi/Gillespie · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Edward Janosko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-07-29 · Gillespie/Eakin · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brooke Cranor mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-28 · Brandkamp 4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Brandkamp mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-15 · Gillespie/Eakin · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Elizabeth Eakin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-07-01 · Gillespie/Eakin · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brooke Cranor mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-06-24 · Gillespie/Eakin · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brooke Cranor mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 5-7
W
2026-06-22 · Brandkamp 4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Doyle mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-06-17 · Brandkamp 4.0 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashley Doyle mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-15 · Gillespie/Eakin · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brooke Cranor mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-06-13 · #1 Doubles · with Zachary Manfredi championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-13 · #2 Doubles · with Brendan Bastable championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.5
100%
5W–0L · 68.9% of games
4.0
68.8%
22W–10L · 59.6% of games
7.5
54.5%
6W–5L · 52.7% of games
8.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 52.5% of games
3.5mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 56.6% of games
4.0mixed
63.6%
7W–4L · 52.9% of games
4.5mixed
33.3%
4W–8L · 46.9% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 51% of games
8.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
43 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
24 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer