← Search

Julie Grahl

— year-end
123 matches · 87W–36L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Julie Grahl to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history123 matches
W
2026-09-14 · DConrad/SSmulktis (Park Road) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Laura Clancy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-09-11 · RKartes/JGrahl (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Rubina Batt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-09-01 · DConrad/SSmulktis (Park Road) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Danielle Conrad
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-08-28 · RKartes/JGrahl (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lauren Mulcahy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-24 · DConrad/SSmulktis (Park Road) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Nicole Woodley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-21 · RKartes/JGrahl (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lauren Mulcahy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
Enid Randall / Ashley Smith
2026-08-14 · RKartes/JGrahl (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lisa Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-17 · JGrahl/LMulcahy (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Diaz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
N/A
2026-07-13 · MMetzl (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Rosalyn Kartes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-03 · JGrahl/LMulcahy (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rosalyn Kartes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-06-26 · JGrahl/LMulcahy (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rosalyn Kartes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-06-15 · MMetzl (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rosalyn Kartes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
Teams30 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
100%
4W–0L · 67.6% of games
3.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 66.4% of games
4.0
85%
17W–3L · 65.3% of games
4.5
48.1%
13W–14L · 49.9% of games
6.5
100%
5W–0L · 78.9% of games
7.5
80%
4W–1L · 57% of games
8.5
64.3%
18W–10L · 57.3% of games
4.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 43.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
54 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
41 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
27 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer