← Search

Emily McEwen

Charlotte, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
51 matches · 31W–20L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Emily McEwen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history51 matches
L
2026-09-14 · MMiller (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Taylor Young
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-04 · MMiller/BHartman (Myers Park) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Christina Desai
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-08-31 · MMiller (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mary Peterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-28 · MMiller/BHartman (Myers Park) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Beth Carpenter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-24 · MMiller (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Carrie Fisher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
Ashley Smith / Monica Nee
2026-08-21 · MMiller/BHartman (Myers Park) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Colleen Cook
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-08 · AMoss/Foose (Myers Park) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brooke Kern
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-01 · AMoss/Foose (Myers Park) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
Wendy Parker / Nily Willis
2026-05-19 · #1 Doubles · with Megan McKeever championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-05-18 · AMoss/Foose (Myers Park) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Logan Foose
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-05-01 · MMiller (Myers Park) · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Betsy Hartman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-24 · MMcKeever/KHillard (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Megan McKeever
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
72.7%
8W–3L · 58% of games
4.0
50%
10W–10L · 51.8% of games
4.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
75%
3W–1L · 63.1% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.5
75%
6W–2L · 53.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 33% of the time
#2 Doubles
33%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
14 matches
#1 Singles
16%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
8 matches
#2 Singles
8%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova