← Search

Cyndy Fettig

Cary, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
226 matches · 133W–93L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Cyndy Fettig to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history226 matches
W
2026-09-08 · TOC.Thio · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Maria Hernandez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-08-20 · ACP.Murphy · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with SIUHING LAI
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-08-18 · TOC.Thio · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Maria Hernandez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-08-10 · TOC.Hinckley · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jamie Hinckley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-08-07 · TOC.Hinckley · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elizabeth Parrish
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
W
2026-08-04 · TOC.Thio · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Maria Hernandez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-07-31 · ACP.Qubeck · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessie Brinkley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-07-31 · TOC.Hinckley · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rebecca King
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-07-19 · KF.Tapp · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeff Brown mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-07-16 · TOC.Hinckley · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Raasch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-08 · NMAC.Thio · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shirley Kim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
L
2026-07-01 · NMAC.Thio · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maya Ress
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams58 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
75%
9W–3L · 66.2% of games
3.0
61.5%
24W–15L · 56.4% of games
3.5
50.6%
45W–44L · 52.1% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.0
60%
3W–2L · 58.2% of games
5.5
63%
17W–10L · 53.5% of games
6.5
83.3%
25W–5L · 62.5% of games
7.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 38.5% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
101 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
72 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
33 matches
#1 Singles
6%
14 matches
#2 Singles
2%
4 matches
#3 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer